I spent the day in Edmonton yesterday, and found myself begging the wife to let me off the hook after several hours of doing the mall thing with her and my son. West Edmonton Mall is one of our favourite places to travel to, and since my son is almost 3, he is now able to verbalize the things he sees and the things he wants to do. Riding the bumper boats of course is what he wanted to do most, but he is just a little too young to handle those things by himself. Being sick doesn’t help either, so instead he had to settle for watching the sea lion show.

I managed to slip away for a couple of hours to see what was happening in the poker room at the Palace Casino which is also in the mall. After waiting about a half hour, I finally made it into the 3-6 game (Limit Hold’em). It didn’t go well and I would love to share all of my bad beats with you, including being hammered by quads, but instead I will share just one instance of the game that grabbed me by surprise.
During play on one of the hands, the dealer is about to burn a card before putting up the “turn card” and noticed that it was boxed. This means that the burn card came off the deck face up. Having worked many years in the casino industry and particularly in poker, I knew exactly what the ruling from the Houseman would be, or should I say “should be”. This is one of those rules that I have found to be universally accepted by every card room I have ever worked in or played in. To make understanding this rule simple, I will quote out of a widely used poker rule book called “Roberts Rules Of Poker”.
A card discovered face up in the deck (boxed card) will be treated as a meaningless scrap of paper. A card being treated as a scrap of paper will be replaced by the next card below it in the deck, except when the next card has already been dealt face down to another player and mixed in with other down cards. In that case, the card that was face up in the deck will be replaced after all other cards are dealt for that round.
So to finish the story . . . the Houseman is called over to table and the dealer explains the situation. The Houseman announces that the boxed card is (as the rule states) a meaningless piece of paper. After making this announcement, the dealer nods to the Houseman as if to communicate a level of understanding and the Housemen then walks away. As he is walking away, the dealer continues to use the burn card (that is boxed) as the burn card, and then puts up the “turn card” just as she would had the burn card not been boxed at all.
No one at the table said a word and play continued to completion. I was not involved in the hand, so I also chose not to say anything, although I was baffled that things went down that way. The burn card should have been put aside and the next card should have been used in its place as the rule states. Was I the only person at the table to see what had happened, or cared? I believe I was. The Houseman should have stayed long enough to watch what the dealer did after making the ruling. I would bet dollars to doughnuts that even had he stayed and watched, the results would have remained the same.
What I believe happens with a lot of poker room management, is that they get used to hearing common solutions such as the “piece of paper” situation. Sure it is to be viewed as a meaningless scrap of paper, but that is not the end of it. There is more. The card needs to be put off to the side so that play can continue with the next card immediately replacing the boxed card. How more simple can it get? Not simple enough obviously, as I sat there bewildered.
I guess some things just are what they are, and there is no point stewing after seeing the failed execution of a correct call. I am not suggesting that everyone needs to be perfect, nor am I suggesting that people need to speak up every time an iregularity such as this one occurs. What was insane about this situation, was the fact that I seemed to be the only person that picked up on it. This is no insinuation that poker industry professionals in Edmonton are less perfect than what you would find in Calgary (God knows there are some horrible Houseman here as well), but maybe the low limit players in Edmonton are slightly more clueless? Or maybe it is that they are simply more polite? That can’t be ruled out as an explanation to the unique poker anomaly I happened to witness. At any rate, I did notice that at the Palace Casino, the players treat their dealers a lot better than what you would see in Calgary, at least that particular time.
Good for you Edmonton! I will come play with you guys anytime, and maybe next time I will have enough time to invest, so that I can take a better crack at some of your money.
Kevin plays at CanadaPoker.com